Tech Rating Politicians

Let’s face it, the elected offices in the US government are filled with mostly technologically illiterate people. That means that those who are representing us on important issues like net neutrality, spam laws, video game restrictions, patent laws, and other technical issues are, in many cases, the least qualified people to do so. A couple of recent examples:

Jon Stewart, fast becoming America’s most trusted new source, examines the controversy around video game violence. How is an expert in ‘pong’ qualified to make decisions about games like Worlds of Warcraft or Counter-Strike. It’s like a bicycle repairman from the 1800s commenting on hybrid cars.

Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) finds himself forced to explain the internet. “It’s not a truck. It’s a series of tubes.” Thankfully, we’re all clear on that fact.

And so, seeing that the problem is out of hand, and that the American voter has little or no means to quickly assess a candidates level of technical knowledge, I propose a standardized rating system (clever acronym TBD). If we could pick a standard way of rating someone’s technical capabilities, we would all be able to make more informed choices.

Now, there are several requirements here:

1. It must be a normalized number (1-10 or such).

2. It must be objective.

3. It must be repeatable (i.e. same score, different scorers).

I think we could come up with a simple formula that would do the trick based on time spent computing per 24 hrs, average complexity of tasks undertaken, and perhaps a little weight based on usual operating system.

One thought on “Tech Rating Politicians”

Comments are closed.